So you've already familiarised yourself with how to get into med school and are thinking about Oxford or Cambridge.
Here we weigh up the pros and cons of studying medicine at Oxbridge and go through how they differ from other universities.
The Universities of Oxford and Cambridge (Oxbridge) have long had an aura of being an ancient, inaccessible and elitist system.
So is there an impenetrable barrier to all but the brightest students?
The first points to keep in mind:
Both Oxford and Cambridge were founded over 800 years ago and have similar collegiate systems with international reputations of academic excellence. You apply to the college itself, not to the university. Some colleges are more competitive than others.
Due to their similarities and competition, candidates are only allowed to apply for either Cambridge or Oxford colleges, not both.
Things to consider:
The majority of the core material is delivered in a lecture hall, with the entire year group in the hall.
Practicals include anatomy dissection and physiology practicals. Practicals are done in smaller groups.
These are sessions held with supervisors, often lecturers or graduates; there may be up to four per week for an hour each time.
Each session may involve analysing a core problem, resulting in a deeper understanding of core subjects. There is homework in the form of essays or set problems.
The time commitment is significant, often students work 5–8 hours to prepare for each hour of supervision, and sometimes the supervision is in a ratio of 1:2, one supervisor to two students, leading to an often very intense learning environment where there is nowhere to hide.
You will be typically invited to interview in December based on the strength of your BMAT test score and UCAS application.
There are usually two interviews:
Sometimes you may get two science-based interviews, or a mixed interview with both science and non-science questions.
Learn more about medical school interviews
Each Oxbridge interview is different and unscripted.
The interviewers are considering how the candidate will fit in with their college system, and how it would be able to supervise and conduct tutorials with the student if accepted.
This means that the interviewers would like to engage the student in a grounded discussion, approaching scientific problems and seeing how the student solves problems, rather than looking for factual answers.
Because of this, the interviewer will often start with a common question that they ask all candidates, such as ‘What is a disease?’. Then, depending on the student’s answers, the interviewer will begin to focus on certain aspects, such as ‘You mentioned genetic diseases, tell me about them.’ Depending on how the student answers, the interviewer will then hone in and focus on certain diseases.
This is the Socratic method of discussion which allows the interviewer to see how students react to new information and process questions, and it will reveal the student’s thought processes in action.
However, practising such lists of previous questions can prepare the candidate to coherently think and fashion their answers. Therefore, we definitely see benefit in students looking at previous real-life answers given by previous interviewees, to see how it plays out in real life.
Learn about how to prepare for a medical school interview
Ultimately, you need to consider how you deal with pressure and whether you like the traditional teaching methods. Look at all the factors to consider when choosing a medical school and decide what is truly important for you.
If your decision to apply to Oxford or Cambridge is based solely on prestige, you may be setting yourself up for disappointment. Many students drop out due to the intensity. This is perfect for some and terrible for others!
Get Into Medical School
2 in 3 trust Medify for UCAT preparation